TAKE ACTION NOW
Help Protect the Marbled Murrelet in Washington State!
This endangered seabird feeds in the ocean and flies up to 55 miles inland to nest in old growth forest. The Washington state population of this unique bird has shrunk by 44% over the last 15 years, leaving only about 7,500 birds remaining. Now your input is needed to protect the Marbled Murrelet.
The Department of the Natural Resources (DNR) and the Long-term Conservation Strategy
Statewide, the DNR manages approximately two million acres of land. 29-47% of DNR’s forests that are within 55 miles of salt water are critical to Marbled Murrelets. These state-owned forests are either classified as habitat occupied by nesting Marbled Murrelets, are buffers around that habitat, or are biologically-important potential recovery habitat.
Unfortunately, most Marbled Murrelet nesting habitat on private lands has been logged. Though many of our older forests on federal lands are protected as parks (Olympic, North Cascades, and Mount Rainier National Parks, for example), many of these forests are too far from the Pacific Ocean and Puget Sound where the Marbled Murrelets spend most of their lives. The closer proximity of the DNR-managed forests in certain areas of the state, such as Southwest Washington, make these forests particularly important. Virtually all scientists agree that, based on their location and age, many of DNR’s older forests are biologically significant for the survival and recovery of Marbled Murrelets in Washington. For decades, scientists have concurred that the loss of nesting habitat is the primary reason for the decline in Marbled Murrelet populations. Ocean conditions are also a factor, but a significantly less important factor than nesting habitat.
DNR is preparing a Long-term Conservation Strategy (LTCS), as required by DNR’s 1997 federal Habitat Conservation Plan. In 2010, DNR informally rejected the 2008 Science Team Report and developed their own set of alternative conservation strategies. Of the six alternatives, only one (Alternative F) was based on a formal science-based process. The projections for all six alternatives show a continued population decline for the bird. The proposed alternatives simply do not set aside enough contiguous older forest habitat to allow our state’s Marbled Murrelet populations to stabilize and recover.
The Conservation Alternative: Using the Best Available Science
A coalition of environmental groups is proposing a new Conservation Alternative, which will be the only alternative designed to make long-term contributions to Marbled Murrelet conservation and to timber-industry sustainability in our state.
This is where your voice matters! Public comments on the Long-term Conservation Strategy are being accepted until 5:00 pm on Thursday March 9, 2017.
Here’s how to submit your comment (choose one):
In person: Come to a public information meeting on Thursday January 12 from 6-8 pm at Whitman Middle School in Seattle’s Ballard/Crown Hill neighborhood: 9201 15th Avenue NW, Seattle, 98117.
In writing: Mail to SEPA Center, PO Box 47015, Olympia, WA 98504-7015
In email: Send to firstname.lastname@example.org
*Make sure to include ‘SEPA File No. 12-042001’ in the subject line of email and written comments. Not sure what to say? See some sample comments below, or write your own!
Contact Seattle Audubon’s Conservation Manager at email@example.com for more information.
Sample Comments for the Marbled Murrelet Long-term Conservation Strategy
RE: SEPA File No. 12-042001
Dear Department of Natural Resources,
I am very concerned about the decline in Marbled Murrelet populations in our state. Please consider analyzing the proposed Conservation Alternative.
Sample Comment #1:
All six of the current strategies being considered by the DNR show a declining population trend for the next 50 years. None of the alternatives contribute to Marbled Murrelet survival and recovery. This is demonstrated by the DNR's own population modelling.
Sample Comment #2:
Alternative F, which is based on the 2008 Science Team Report, comes closest to reaching Marbled Murrelet recovery goals, but unfortunately this alternative does not include important, more recent scientific findings. For example, a 2015 study identified the regional importance of the Strait of Juan de Fuca as a "hotspot," not previously recognized, of murrelet at-sea density adjacent to high/higher quality nesting habitat. An effective conservation and recovery strategy must be based on best available science.
Sample Comment #3:
DNR-managed lands contain approximately 15% (213,000 acres) of all existing Marbled Murrelet habitat in the state, and this habitat is needed to serve as a temporal "bridge" to support the bird's population over the next 30-50 years while it is most vulnerable to extirpation.
Sample Comment #4:
DNR's best option for Marbled Murrelets, Alternative F, allows the harvest of 25,000 acres of mature forest habitat that is needed for the poplation to stabilize and recover. The DNR and USFWS should consider the new proposed Conservation Alternative as a stronger, more effective strategy with considerably lower harvest volume to prevent the local extinction of the Marbled Murrelet.
[Your name and best contact information here]
Earlier Murrelet Work
July 2014 - The Seattle Audubon Society and the Olympic Forest Coalition lose court battle to protect high quality habitat for the Marbled Murrelet. Read the letter from the Conservation Committee addressing the issue.
April 2014 - Seattle Audubon enters into litigation to prevent the Washington Department of Natural Resources from logging scientifically recognized and important Marbled Murrelet habitat on the Olympic Peninsula.
October 2013 - Seattle Audubon Board of Directors adopts Marbled Murrelet Conservation Resolution.
September 2013 - U.S. District Court Judge John Bates in Washington, D.C. rejected a timber industry bid to eliminate Endangered Species Act protections for the Marbled Murrelet which would have allowed the expansion of logging in the seabird’s old-growth forest nesting habitat.
July 2013 - King County Superior Court's Judge Heller ruled that the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) violated the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) by prematurely attempting to allow logging on lands that have been protected for consideration in a long term conservation plan.